
Publish. Pin. Keep a fallback.
Build a complete release bundle, plan retention, verify real retrieval paths, and practice rollback before you need it.
Read the guideThe chain is one part of the experience. Account for the files, names, endpoints, publishing access, and maintenance processes around it.
Trace a page from the address a visitor opens to the files, images, application data, and status information it needs. Identify the operator and failure behavior of each dependency. This inventory is more useful than calling the entire project decentralized without saying which components that description covers.
For IPFS publishing, plan retention rather than assuming that one successful upload establishes long-term availability. The IPFS documentation explains pinning as protection against garbage collection on a node. Record who retains the release, how it is retrieved, and which public entry point identifies the intended version.
A team may distribute frontend files while retaining centralized control over the domain or release pointer. Record who can make those changes and how they are reviewed. This is a design boundary to understand, not something a hosting label automatically resolves. Keep an auditable release record and a tested recovery procedure.
The documentation might load while an application-data service is unavailable. Explain which feature lacks current evidence rather than displaying a generic claim that the network has failed. Keep conceptual pages readable without wallet access, and make recovery guidance available through a route that does not depend on the failed action.
IPFS distinguishes persistence, pinning, and permanence and discusses the responsibilities involved in retaining content.
Read the IPFS persistence guideNo. Plan persistent retention and verify retrieval. The delivery network does not remove the need for someone to retain the files and operate the surrounding publishing workflow.
Yes. Describe its role accurately in the dependency map and assess the resulting trust and availability assumptions rather than hiding them behind the project label.